The Incident
On a chilly morning in February 2023, a contract cleaning crew was performing their routine duties in a commercial office building in downtown Toronto, Ontario. The building, a multi-story structure housing various businesses, was largely empty, as many employees were still working remotely or had not yet arrived. A junior cleaner, new to the team and still undergoing on-the-job training, was tasked with cleaning the washrooms on the 10th floor. He noticed that the toilet bowls were particularly stained and, in an effort to achieve a 'sparkling' result, decided to use a combination of two cleaning products he found in the janitorial cart: a strong acid-based toilet bowl cleaner and a bleach-based disinfectant. Unaware of the severe chemical incompatibility, he poured both liquids into several toilet bowls.
Within minutes, a pungent, irritating odour began to fill the washroom. The cleaner immediately felt a burning sensation in his eyes and throat, and started coughing uncontrollably. He quickly exited the washroom, alerting his supervisor to the strange smell. The supervisor, recognizing the potential danger, immediately initiated an evacuation of the floor and called emergency services. Firefighters and hazmat teams arrived swiftly, identifying the gas as chlorine, a highly toxic substance. Three cleaners, including the junior worker, required medical attention for respiratory irritation and chemical burns to their eyes. The building remained partially evacuated for several hours while ventilation and air quality checks were performed.
What Went Wrong
This incident was a textbook example of multiple safety failures, all directly addressable by robust WHMIS protocols. Firstly, there was a fundamental lack of understanding regarding chemical compatibility. The junior cleaner, and likely others, had not received adequate training on the dangers of mixing common cleaning agents. The acid-based cleaner (containing hydrochloric acid) and the bleach-based disinfectant (containing sodium hypochlorite) are highly reactive when combined, producing toxic chlorine gas. This chemical reaction is a well-known hazard in the cleaning industry.
Secondly, the labeling on the product containers, while likely compliant, was not effectively communicated or understood. While the labels would have contained hazard pictograms (e.g., 'Corrosion' for the acid, 'Exclamation Mark' for irritants/health hazards, and potentially 'Skull and Crossbones' if highly toxic) and hazard statements, the cleaner either did not read them, or did not comprehend the severity of the warnings, particularly regarding mixing instructions. There was also a clear absence of a site-specific chemical inventory and associated Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) readily accessible and understood by the cleaning staff, which would explicitly detail incompatibility warnings.
Finally, the lack of proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for handling these chemicals contributed to the injuries. While the cleaners likely wore gloves, they were not equipped with appropriate respiratory protection or eye protection sufficient for a chemical release of this nature. More importantly, the incident highlights a failure in hazard assessment and control measures; the risk of mixing these chemicals should have been identified and mitigated through clear procedures and training, not just reliance on PPE during an emergency.
How WHMIS Training Could Have Prevented This
Comprehensive WHMIS 2015 training would have been instrumental in preventing this incident. Here's how:
-
Hazard Identification and Communication: WHMIS training emphasizes understanding hazard pictograms. The 'Corrosion' pictogram on the acid cleaner and the 'Exclamation Mark' or 'Skull and Crossbones' (if applicable) on the bleach would immediately signal danger. Training would teach workers that chemicals bearing certain pictograms, especially those indicating severe hazards, require careful handling and should never be mixed without explicit instructions. The 'Health Hazard' pictogram for respiratory sensitizers would also be relevant.
-
Safety Data Sheets (SDSs): Proper WHMIS training would instruct workers on how to access, read, and understand SDSs. Section 7 of an SDS, "Handling and Storage," would explicitly warn against mixing the acid with bleach. Section 2, "Hazard Identification," would detail the risks of toxic gas formation. Section 8, "Exposure Controls/Personal Protection," would specify the required PPE, including respiratory protection, for handling these chemicals, and Section 10, "Stability and Reactivity," would clearly list incompatible materials.
-
Workplace Labels and Procedures: Beyond supplier labels, WHMIS requires workplace labels for decanted products. More crucially, it mandates clear, site-specific work procedures. Training would ensure that cleaners are not only aware of these procedures but also understand the why behind them, particularly the dangers of chemical incompatibility. A simple, clear instruction like "Never mix acid-based cleaners with bleach-based products" prominently displayed and reinforced through training would have been invaluable.
-
Education on Hazard Classes: WHMIS training covers various hazard classes, including 'Acute Toxicity' (which chlorine gas falls under), 'Skin Corrosion/Irritation,' and 'Serious Eye Damage/Eye Irritation.' Understanding these classes helps workers grasp the potential harm and the importance of following safety protocols.
-
Emergency Procedures: While not preventing the incident, WHMIS training also covers emergency response, including immediate evacuation, first aid, and proper reporting, which were thankfully followed by the supervisor, mitigating further harm.
Key Takeaways
This Toronto incident underscores that even common, seemingly innocuous cleaning products can pose severe risks if not handled correctly. The core lesson is that WHMIS is not just about labels and SDSs; it's about fostering a deep understanding of chemical hazards and safe work practices. Employers must ensure that all workers, especially those new to a role or handling a variety of chemicals, receive comprehensive, hands-on WHMIS training that includes practical scenarios and emphasizes chemical compatibility. Regular refreshers and site-specific training are crucial to prevent similar, entirely avoidable, toxic exposures.